Kaplan, CihangirGüleç, CemArıkoğlu, MesutToros, SerkanKorkmaz, Habip Gökay2024-11-072024-11-0720222564-6605https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1034351https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/513517https://hdl.handle.net/11480/12534Within the scope of this study, the effects of yield and hardening criteria used in forming simulations on part geometric dimensions were investigated. As material 0.8 mm thick DC04 material is used. In the study, the results were compared using the Hill-48 and Barlat-91 yield criteria and experimental flow curve, Hockett-Sherby, Ludwig and Hollomon flow curve models. The studies were carried out in Simufact Sheet Metal Form software. Although all the models studied because of dimensional evaluations estimated within tolerance values, the model in which the experimental data were used with Hill-48 gave the closest results to the nominal dimensions.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMalzeme BilimleriÖzellik ve TestYield CriteriaIroningSheet Metal FormingDeep DrawingArticle11238739210.28948/ngumuh.1034351513517