Yazar "Senol, Ozhan" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 11 / 11
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe A Further Contribution to the Aphid (Hemiptera:Aphidoidea) Fauna of Turkey Including a Description of a New Host Plant Associations and Colony Appearances(Gazi Entomological Research Soc, 2023) Gorur, Gazi; Senol, Ozhan; Akyildirim Begen, Hayal; Baser, Gizem; Akcay, Bengisu VenharAphids fascinated scientists due to their unique life cycles, being a one of the important agricultural pest worldwide, overcoming various applied control strategies and also relatively benefited from global climate change. The importance of aphid studies in developing countries like a Turkey requires additional attention because the effects of aphids on agricultural production. In this aspect, 3 genera, Anthemidaphis Tashev, 1967, Olegia Shaposhnikov, 1979; Pentalonia Coquerel, 1859 and 15 aphid species added to Turkey aphid fauna which are; Anthemidaphis oligommata Tashev 1967, Aphis (Aphis) coreopsidis (Thom as, 1878), Aphis (Aphis) narzikulovi Szelegiewicz, 1963, Aphis (Aphis) pseudeuphorbiae Hille Ris Lambers, 1948, Aphis (Aphis) picridis (Borner, 1950), Chaitophorus clarus Tseng & Tao 1936, Chaitophorus parvus Hille Ris Lambers, 1935, Dysaphis (Pomaphis) gallica (Hille Ris Lambers, 1955), Melanaphis sorghi Theobald, 1904, Metopolophium (Metopolophium) festucae Theobald, 1917, Olegia ulmifoliae (Aoki, 1973), Schizaphis (Schizaphis) nigerrima (Hille Ris Lambers, 1931), Semiaphis heraclei (Takahashi, 1921), Semiaphis pastinacae Borner, 1950, Pentalonia nigronervosa Coquerel, 1859. Recorded species were evaluated for host plant relations, colony appearances, also ant attendance and new interactions observed. Number of the listed aphid species for Turkey aphid fauna increased to 631 with these new records.Öğe Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) species in Burdur urban parks with three records for the fauna of Turkey, their host plants and predators(Entomological Soc Turkey, Ege Univ, 2021) Patlar, Gulser; Oguzoglu, Sukran; Avci, Mustafa; Senol, OzhanThis study was conducted to identify the aphid species on 34 ornamental plants in 16 urban parks in the provincial center of Burdur and their predators in April-November 2018-2019. Forty-eight species in 23 genera of Aphididae were detected. Aphis craccivora Koch, 1854, Cinara (Cupressobium) tujafilina (Del Guercio, 1909) and Macrosiphum rosae (L., 1758) were most abundant species. Aphis berberidorum Ortego & Mier Durante, 1997, Hannabura alnicola Matsumura, 1917 and Prociphilus fraxinifolii (Riley, 1879) were three new records for the aphid fauna of Turkey. The genus Hannabura was recorded for the first time in Turkey. Twenty-nine insect predators of aphids were identified from Coccinellidae (24), Cantharidae (1) (Coleoptera), Nabidae (1), Miridae (1) (Hemiptera), Sryphidae (1) (Diptera) and Forficulidae (1) (Dermaptera). No predators were seen on 12 aphid species and just a single predator each for 11 aphid species. The highest host plant diversity was observed for A. craccivora and Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach, 1843), with three plant species each. The highest number of aphid species (8 species) was found on Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe.Öğe Aphid species (Hemiptera: Aphidoidae) determined from Antalya, Karaman and Mugla with new aphid records(Entomological Soc Turkey, Ege Univ, 2023) Begen, Hayal Akyildirim; Gorur, Gazi; Senol, Ozhan; Baser, Gizem; Akcay, Bengisu VenharAphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidae) are obligatory phytophagous and many of them highly polyphagous pests and distributed almost all parts of the earth, especially temperature zone. Turkiye has a potential area for aphids because of its rich plant diversity and different climatic region. Most of the aphid species is specific to their host plant and both cause direct and indirect damages. So far, 654 aphid species have been determined on numerous host plants in Turkiye. As a result of the study conducted in Antalya, Karaman and Mugla provinces in Turkiye between March 2020 and September 2021, 12 aphid species were added to Turkiye aphidofauna. These species are Amphorophora urtica Essig, 1942 on Urtica dioica L., Aphis crepidis (Borner, 1940) on Crepis capillaris L. (Wallr.), Chaitophorus utahensis (Knowlton, 1928) on Salix sp., Monelliopsis caryae (Monell, 1879) on Juglans regia L., Doraphis populi (Maskell, 1898) on Populus sp., Eulachnus mediterraneus Binazzi, 1983 on Pinus sp., Metopolophium montanum Hille Ris Lambers, 1966 on Rosa sp., Protaphis echinopis (Hille Ris Lambers, 1948) on Echinops viscosus DC., Prociphilus erigeronensis (Thomas, 1879) on Cichorium sp., Sitobion leelamaniae (David, 1958) on Poa sp. and Triticum sp., Tiliaphis pseudoshinae Quednau, 1979 on Tilia sp. and Uroleucon iranicum Holman, 1980 on Gundelia tournefortii (L.). Turkiye aphidofauna has reached 666 species with this study. Detailed information of locality of new records are also given.Öğe Determined Aphid and Ant Associations from Trabzon, Rize and Artvin Provinces of the Turkey(GAZI ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH SOC, 2014) Akyildirim, Hayal; Senol, Ozhan; Gorur, Gazi; Aktac, Nihat; Demirtas, EminAphids and ant species are both diverse and extremely succesful groups of insects and often share the same habitats and therefore both have many oportunities to interact with each other. It has been shown that aphid-ant relationships have been shaped by various factors particularly aphid host plant's physological features, honeydew composition, feeding position and so on. Despite there are more than 500 aphid species and about 315 ant taxon in Turkey, there are very few studies conducted on their mutual relationship. This study was carried out in the Trabzon, Rize and Artvin provinces of Turkey. As a result of the evaluation of samples, it was determined that 48 aphid species associated with 15 ant species. The most encountered ant species, which interacted with different number of aphid species, were Formica cinereofusca Karawaiew, 1929, Lasius turcicus Santschi, 1921 and Lasius emarginatus (Olivier, 1792). Among determined aphid species Aphis fabae Scopoli, 1763 had the highest ant attraction and then Brachycaudus cardui (Linnaeus, 1758), Aphis gossypii Glover, 1877, Aphis spiraecola Patch, 1914, Cinara pilicornis (Hartig, 1841) and Toxoptera aurantii Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841 respectively. Determined aphid-ant associations are shaped by both ecological conditions of the study area, composition of aphid and ant populations and it was shown that there is no new aphid-ant species association. Findings of the presented study indicated that much more detailed study should be conducted to investigate aphid-ant mutualistic associations in Turkey.Öğe Genetic Variations of Growth Hormone Receptor Exon 10 in Blind Mole-Rat Superspecies (Rodentia: Spalacidae) in Turkey(Inst Zoology, Bas, 2024) Kankilic, Teoman; Tatyuz, Ilhan; Kankilic, Tolga; Civelek, Ilkay; Senol, OzhanA phylogenetic analysis of 16 cytotypes in a sample of 105 blind mole -rats of the genus Nannospalax Palmer, 1903 from the entire Anatolian region has been carried out. Three superspecies (N. xanthodon, N. leucodon and N. ehrenbergi) were found to have undergone monophyletic radiations. We determined that the superspecies N. ehrenbergi and N. xanthodon contain a mixture of cryptic species distributed in the Anatolian part of Turkey. Our study indicated a fundamental split between two groups, one consisting of populations of N. ehrenbergi from the South-eastern Anatolia and the other including the remaining taxa (N. xanthodon and N. leucodon) from the remaining regions of Anatolia and from Thrace. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that there were two new unnamed cryptic species (2n=48-52 cytotype group and 2n=56 cytotype group) within the superspecies N. ehrenbergi that were reciprocally monophyletic. We reviewed species identified by traditional morphological methods to determine their taxonomic validity. We suggest that N. cilicicus (stat. n.), which is endemic to the central Anatolia, has to be considered a distinct species and not a synonym of N. xanthodon.Öğe New additions and invasive aphids for Turkey's aphidofauna (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea)(TUBITAK SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY, 2015) Senol, Ozhan; Begen, Hayal Akyildirim; Gorur, Gazi; Demirtas, EminThis study was carried out in order to determine aphid species in the Inner Western Anatolian Subregion of Turkey. Nineteen aphid species are reported as new to the Turkish aphid fauna. These species are Aphis eryngiiglomerata Bozhko, 1963; Aphis glareosae Bozhko, 1959; Capitophorus eniwanus Miyazaki, 1971; Chaitophorus indicus A. K. Ghosh, M. R. Ghosh & D.N. Raychaudhuri, 1970; Chaitophorus ramicola (Borner, 1949); Cinara indica Verma, 1970; Cinara juniperensis (Gillette & Palmer, 1925); Cinara oxycedri Binazzi, 1996; Cinara setosa (Borner, 1950); Eulachnus thunbergii Wilson, 1919; Hyadaphis passerinii (Del Guercio, 1911); Mindarus kinseyi Voegtlin, 1995; Myzus padellus Hille Ris Lambers & Rogerson, 1946; Phylloxera quercina (Ferrari, 1872); Rhopalosiphum rufulum Richards, 1960; Schizaphis dubia Huculak, 1968; Schizolachnus orientalis (Takahashi, 1924); Tiliaphis shinjii Higuchi, 1972; and Tuberculatus borealis (Krzywiec, 1971). Among these, 5 species are invasive to the Turkish aphidofauna. It is not surprising that new records and invasive species would be added to the Turkish aphid fauna due to Turkey's special floristic composition and various geographical and climatic features.Öğe New contributions to the Turkish aphid fauna and species composition (Hemiptera: Aphididomorpha) in Isparta forests(Entomological Soc Turkey, Ege Univ, 2022) Oguzoglu, Sukran; Avci, Mustafa; Senol, OzhanA study was conducted on the aphid fauna of Pinus nigra Arnold. subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe., Pinus brutia Ten., Cedrus libani A. Rich., Abies cilicica (Antoine & Kotschy) Carriere (Pinaceae), Juniperus spp. (Cupressaceae), Quercus spp. (Fagaceae) and Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Leguminosae) forests in Isparta Province between 2018 and 2020. Using systematic and random sampling, 9,252 specimens in 68 species from the families Aphididae and Phylloxeridae (14 species at genus level only) were identified between 2018 and 2020. It was determined that Appendiseta robiniae (Gillette, 1907) collected from R. pseudoacacia is a Nearctic species, which was identified as a new record for the aphid fauna of Turkiye. Fifty-five species were detected in 2019, and a further 51 in 2020 using systematic sampling. The species with the highest number of specimens in 2019 were Myzocallis boerneri Stroyan, 1957 (16.0%), Eulachnus rileyi (Williams, 1911) (12.3%) and Cinara cedri Mimeur, 1936 (10.4%). In 2020, the species with the highest number of specimens were E. rileyi (10.1%), A. robiniae (9.3%) and Cinara orientalis (Takahashi, 1924) (7.2%). The highest number of aphid species was collected from P. nigra in the three years (2018-2020). The second highest numbers were collected from Quercus coccifera L. in 2018 and 2020, and P. brutia in 2019.Öğe New Records for the Aphid Fauna (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of Turkey(INST ZOOLOGY, BAS, 2014) Senol, Ozhan; Akyildirim, Hayal; Gorur, Gazi; Demirtas, EminNine aphid species are recorded for the first time for the aphid fauna of Turkey. Samples originate from Inner West Anatolian, Central Anatolian and Middle Black Sea Regions of Turkey. The species recorded are Cinara piniphila (Ratzeburg, 1844), Eulachnus tauricus Bozhko, 1961, Monaphis antennata (Kaltenbach, 1843), Pemphigus phenax Borner & Blunck, 1916, Pineus pineoides (Cholodkovsky, 1903), Stomaphis brastislavensis Czylok & Blackman, 1991, Thelaxes valtodoresi Remaudiere, 1982, Therioaphis subalba Borner, 1949 and Thoracaphis flava Takahashi, 1950.Öğe Novel contribution to the Turkiye aphid fauna with new host plant associations(Univ Oradea Publ House, 2023) Gorur, Gazi; Begen, Hayal Akyildirim; Senol, Ozhan; Baser, Gizem[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Some new aphid records for the Turkish aphidofauna (Hemiptera: Aphidoidae)(TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2015) Senol, Ozhan; Begen, Hayal Akyildirim; Gorur, Gazi; Gezici, Gizem[Abstract Not Available]Öğe The karyotype studies of some aphid species (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) from Niğde province in Türkiye(Entomological Soc Turkey, Ege Univ, 2024) Sahin, Suemeyye Betul; Senol, OzhanThe biological features of aphids as holocentricity, parthenogenetic reproduction, and telescopic generation have fascinated researchers to conduct chromosomal studies. Because of their chromosomes' holocentricity, the fragmentation fusion leads to karyotypic variations in aphid species. In phytophagous insects like aphids, holocentrism can be related to production of compounds that induce chromosomal variations. In the current study, the evaluation of karyotypes of six aphid species belonging to six genera that infest different host plants at the Ni & gbreve;de & Ouml;mer Halisdemir University campus area was conducted between September and November 2022. Evaluated species were Acyrthosiphon ( Acyrthosiphon ) ilka Mordvilko, 1914, Aphis ( Aphis ) spiraecola Patch, 1914, Brachycaudus ( Brachycaudus ) helichrysi (Kaltenbach, 1843), Cinara ( Cinara ) curvipes (Patch, 1912), Macrosiphum ( Macrosiphum ) rosae (L., 1758), and Pterochloroides persicae (Cholodkovsky, 1898). The C. curvipes and A. ilka karyotypes were determined for the first time in this study.
