Yazar "Uçar, Taha" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Laparoscopy training in Turkey through the view of residents;Turkish European Society of Residents in urology questionnaire
    (2022) Atış, Ramazan Gökhan; Uçar, Taha; Ekşi, Mithat; Keser, Ferhat; Sılay, Mesrur Selçuk; Yıldırım, Asıf; Çaşkurlu, Turhan
    Objective: Laparoscopy is a minimal invasive surgery technique and getting more important nowadays. The success rate of the techniques used in laparoscopy education and the qualification of urology residents who finished their urology training, is unclear. In our study, qualification of Turkish urology residents for laparoscopy, the preferred educational techniques and the education models were investigated with a national survey. Material and Methods: The laparoscopy questionnaire that is used in our study has been prepared by modification of a questionnaire which was formed by Belgium European European Society of Residents in Urology. The techniques used in laparoscopy education, qualification of the education and the expectations from laparoscopy education were the main focus. All of the questions were Turkish and was sent to a total of 295 residents who are registered to the ESRU database. A total of 70 (23%) residents answered. SurveyMonkey was used for composing and distribution. All the data gathered from the survey was statistically investigated. Results: The biggest contribution was from the Marmara Region (39.29%). Laparoscopy is used in 91,07% of the clinics all around Turkey. The distribution of the residents in regards of year of urology training were: 14% 1st year, 23% 2nd year, 23% 3rd year, 12.7% 4th year, 25% 5th year. Training and Research Hospital and University Hospital participation rates were 46.77% and 53.23% respectively. The rate of residents who feel they will become capable of doing laparoscopic surgery after their residency period finished, was 28.5% and 71.4% of the residents expressed the laparoscopic training they take would not be sufficient. Assistance and observing are used as a training method by nearly all residents (91.07%). In addition being the primary surgeon, training videos, training boxes, animal practices are used by residents with the rate of 26.7%, 25%, 21.4%, 3.5% respectively. According to participants, to be given less opportunity, educational disinterest and limited laparoscopic cases were defined as the major 3 problems in laparoscopy training. Conclusion: The laparoscopy education differs between the urology clinics in Turkey without any standardization. An appropriate standardization of laparoscopy training can improve laparoscopy education and urology training
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy training in Turkey through the view of residents; ESRU Turkey questionnaire
    (2022) Uçar, Taha; Sandıkçı, Fatih; İlgi, Musab; Yıldırım, Asıf; Çaşkurlu, Turhan
    Objective: Retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are common endoscopic surgical procedures. In our study, qualification of the Turkish residents for RIRS/PCNL, the education techniques and models are evaluated by a national based survey.Material and Methods: The techniques used in education, qualification of the education and expectations about the education were main focus. Questionnaire was sent to total of 295 residents who are registered to Turkish European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU) database. A total of 70 (23%) urology residents answered. SurveyMonkey is used for composing and distribution of the surveys. The results were evaluated statistically. Results: Total of 70 participants involved our survey and the rates of first, second, third, fourth, fifth years of residents were 14%, 23%, 23%, 12.7%, 25% respectively. The rates of the residents from training and research hospitals and university were 46.77% and 53.23% respectively. The participants were from all over the country and there were participants from all 7 geographical regions of Turkey. The rate of residents who felt they will become capable of doing RIRS after their residency education program was 63.08% and 36.92% of the residents expressed the RIRS training they took is not enough to perform this procedure after graduation.Assistance and observation are used as the only training method for 39.2% and 49.2% of residents for RIRS and PCNL respectively. In addition, being a primary surgeon is used as a method of training by 55.38% and 50.7% of residents for RIRS and PCNL respectively. PCNL was performed by all the hospitals who were involved in the questionnaire. PCNL training course is needed by 15.38% of participants. The percentage of the residents who can’ t perform RIRS in their hospital was 15.38%. RIRS training course was needed by 15.38% of participants.Conclusion: RIRS and PCNL are common endoscopic surgical processes in Turkey. It’s been thought to be useful to make the courses more common which residents feel important for their education and to make residents eager about PCNL/RIRS education.