Time-varying causality between income inequality and ecological footprint in Turkey

dc.authoridACAR, SAMET/0000-0002-1426-7713
dc.authoridKIRCA, MUSTAFA/0000-0002-5630-7525
dc.authoridAYDIN, ABDULLAH/0000-0002-1785-4999
dc.contributor.authorAltintas, Nurullah
dc.contributor.authorKirca, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Samet
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Musa
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:34:52Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:34:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the relationship between income inequality and environmental degradation for the case of Turkey between 1987 and 2017 through the bootstrap causality method that changes over time. The study used the GINI coefficient to denote income inequality and ecological footprint (EFP) to represent environmental degradation. According to the analysis results, a causal relationship has been determined for Turkey from GINI to EFP between 2002 and 2015 and from EFP to GINI between 2002 and 2008. Thanks to the method used in the analysis, it was concluded that GINI-affected EFP positively between 2002 and 2005 and negatively between 2006 and 2015. Between 2002 and 2005, Turkey endured a difficult period of restructuring after two major banking crises in 1999 and 2001. The rapid development, especially in industry and urbanization, caused environmental degradation in this period. Between 2006 and 2015, the central dynamic of Turkey's growth trend was the finance sector, and rapid privatizations were realized. Nevertheless, the income justice improvement in this period negatively impacted the environment due to consumption and production habits. Policymakers should evaluate Turkey in its economic reality and produce policies accordingly. Environmental awareness should be increased in the production and consumption activities of all segments of society, benefiting from the developments in income distribution. The ecological impact of the income redistribution policy, along with its market and social consequences, needs to be evaluated.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-022-22910-3
dc.identifier.endpage11797
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid36097306
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137911815
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage11785
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22910-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/16215
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000852939100005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectIncome inequality
dc.subjectEcological footprint
dc.subjectTime-varying causality
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.titleTime-varying causality between income inequality and ecological footprint in Turkey
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar