Comparison of spinal anaesthesia versus ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block applied with tumescent anaesthesia for single-sided inguinal hernia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKacmaz, Mustafa/0000-0002-8655-3882
dc.contributor.authorKacmaz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBolat, Haci
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:24:39Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:24:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground & aims Primary aim of this study is to determine whether the use of local anaesthesia performed with IINB and IHNB against spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernia repair is accepted as an alternative medicine. Methods 75 cases in the class of American Society of Anesthesia physical status (ASA) I-III between the ages of 18 and 75 diagnosed with single-sided inguinal hernia and hospitalized for surgery in general surgery clinic were prospectively and randomly included in this study. Results There was statistically significant difference between the groups (30.14 +/- 8.2 and 35.51 +/- 9.39) in terms of the duration of the surgery. The duration was shorter in Group 1 (p < 0.001). There was statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the duration of the first mobilization. It was significantly shorter in Group 2 than in Group 1 (5.71 +/- 1.7 and 2.70 +/- 1.53 min) (p < 0.001). Mean duration of length of hospital stay criteria was significantly shorter in Group 2 than in Group 1 (26.00 +/- 6.43 and 14.23 +/- 5.40 h) (p < 0.001). Throughout the follow-up period in postoperative 24 h, the number of patients who needed analgesia was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (91.4% and 45.7%) There was statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of patient satisfaction and urinary retention development (p < 0.005). Hematoma development or postoperative bleeding was not observed in either group. The time of sensory block onset was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (9.66 +/- 1.41 and 9.03 +/- 0.98 min) (p < 0.005) Conclusion The results of our study show that IINB and IHNB applied with local anaesthesia are superior to spinal anaesthesia in unilateral inguinal hernia repairs.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10029-020-02163-0
dc.identifier.endpage1056
dc.identifier.issn1265-4906
dc.identifier.issn1248-9204
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid32162109
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85081735178
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1049
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02163-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/14242
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000562577500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofHernia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectGeneral-Anesthesia
dc.subjectLocal-Anesthesia
dc.subjectRepair
dc.subjectSedation
dc.subjectFeasibility
dc.subjectPain
dc.titleComparison of spinal anaesthesia versus ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block applied with tumescent anaesthesia for single-sided inguinal hernia
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu