Correlation of internal jugular vein, common carotid artery, femoral artery and femoral vein diameters with central venous pressure

dc.contributor.authorBayraktar, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorKacmaz, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:24:54Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:24:54Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to detect the correlation of central venous pressure (CVP) with the internal jugular vein (IJV), common carotid artery (CCA), femoral vein (FV), and femoral artery (FA) diameters measured with ultrasound (USG) in patients under mechanical ventilation to evaluate whether they are suitable to be used as an alternative low-cost and noninvasive method for the detection of CVP. Methods: A total of 40 patients aged from 18 to 90 who had been receiving therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU) were included in the study. Central venous catheter was placed into the patients through right IJV or subclavian vein in their first 24-hour of hospitalization and the right atrium pressure (RAP) was measured from the catheter, the tip of which was confirmed to reach right atrium. In the same session, CCA, IJV, FA, and FV diameters were measured with USG and their correlations with CVP were calculated. In addition, correlations of the measured venous and artery diameters between each other were detected as well. Results: There was a significantly high correlation between CVP and CCA diameter (R = 0.603, P < .000). There was a significantly low correlation between CVP and IJV diameter (R = 0.352, P = .026), a significantly low correlation between FA and FV diameters (R = 0.317, P = .047), a significantly low correlation between FA and CCA diameters (R = 0.330, P = .038), and a significantly low correlation between IJV and CCA diameters (R = 0.364, P = .020). Conclusion: CVP and CCA diameters exhibited a high correlation. For detection of CVP, the ultrasonographic CCA diameter measurement can be used as an alternative noninvasive method which is easy to use and minimally affected by measurement errors of individuals and which has low learning curve compared with the other measurement methods.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000031207
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974
dc.identifier.issn1536-5964
dc.identifier.issue43
dc.identifier.pmid36316929
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140935967
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031207
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/14382
dc.identifier.volume101
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000877294300004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectcentral venous pressure
dc.subjectdiameter measurement
dc.subjecthealth expenditures
dc.subjectintravascular volume
dc.titleCorrelation of internal jugular vein, common carotid artery, femoral artery and femoral vein diameters with central venous pressure
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar