Evaluation of monomer elution, microhardness, and roughness of experimental dental composite resins prepared from Bis-EFMA, a novel monomer system

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridHatipoglu, Omer/0000-0002-4628-8551
dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Omer
dc.contributor.authorTurumtay, Emine Akyuz
dc.contributor.authorSaygin, Aysegul Goze
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:32:33Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:32:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the monomer elution, microhardness, and roughness of experimental resin-based composites (RBCs) prepared from a novel monomer system derived from 9,9-Bis[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl]fluorene) (Bis-EFMA), bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) with each other, also with a commercial RBC, 3 M ESPE FiltekTM Z250 (FZ). Experimental Bis-EFMA (ET), Bis-GMA (BT), and UDMA (UT) based composites were prepared (20% Bis-EFMA or 20% Bis-GMA or 20% UDMA, and 20% triethylene glycol dimethacrylate [TEGDMA], and 60% glass filler). 60 specimens were produced (n = 5) and exposed to ethanol solution for 7 days. Then specimens were tested at baseline (T0), first (T1), third (T2), and seventh (T3) days. ET and FZ released significantly lower TEGDMA than other RBCs did (p < 0.05). BT released significantly higher TEGDMA than other RBCs did at T1 (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between FZ and ET at T1 (p > 0.05). FZ exhibited the highest microhardness at all-time points; besides, the microhardness of BT was lowest at T0, while the microhardness of BT and UT was lower than that of FZ and ET at T1, T2, and T3 (p < 0.05). BT exhibited higher roughness at T2 than the UT did at T0 and T1, significantly (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the other RBCs (p > 0.05). Bis-EFMA, a novel bisphenol A-free monomer system, has the potential to be used in commercial RBCs as a substitute for Bis-GMA in terms of lower monomer elution and higher microhardness.
dc.description.sponsorshipSutcu Imam University [2019/1-24M]
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to extend their appreciation to the Sutcu Imam University for funding the work (Project NO: 2019/1-24M). Besides, they would like to thank Inci Dental Company who assists in the supply of experimental materials.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pc.26401
dc.identifier.endpage592
dc.identifier.issn0272-8397
dc.identifier.issn1548-0569
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119176437
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage584
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26401
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/15466
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000719810000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofPolymer Composites
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectBisphenol A
dc.subjectdental composite material
dc.subjectpolymer composites
dc.subjectresidual monomer
dc.subjectresin matrix
dc.titleEvaluation of monomer elution, microhardness, and roughness of experimental dental composite resins prepared from Bis-EFMA, a novel monomer system
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu