Assessment of bone quality of apical periodontitis treated with MTA plug and regenerative endodontic techniques

dc.authoridKosar, Tugba/0000-0001-5764-5510
dc.authoridSanal Cikman, Ahter/0000-0003-2145-5859
dc.authoridMARAS, EDANUR/0000-0001-7905-2935
dc.authoridGunacar, Dilara Nil/0000-0002-9607-6362
dc.contributor.authorAricioglu, Banu
dc.contributor.authorGunacar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.authorKosar, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorCikman, Ahter Sanal
dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Fatma Pertek
dc.contributor.authorMaras, Edanur
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:34:04Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:34:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractFractal analysis (FA) is a quantitative, objective and non-invasive method that facilitates the characterisation of the tissue architecture. This study aims to compare the periapical healing at 1-year follow-up by evaluating newly generated trabecular bone with FA after Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) plug and regenerative endodontic treatment (RET). A total of 55 asymptomatic teeth with a single-canal, open apex and periapical lesion, treated with MTA plug or RET, were evaluated retrospectively. After considering the inclusion/exclusion criteria, FA was conducted on 30 periapical images using the box-counting method. In both groups, a significant decrease was observed in the periapical lesion size at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the MTA plug and RET (p > 0.01). Significantly higher fractal dimension values were detected at 1-year follow-up in both MTA plug and RET cases (p < 0.01). However, the difference was not significant between the groups (p > 0.01). Both procedures seem to improve periapical healing with a new resistant bone of similar density and complexity.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aej.12697
dc.identifier.endpage450
dc.identifier.issn1329-1947
dc.identifier.issn1747-4477
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid36197584
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139195837
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage444
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12697
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/15766
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000863898700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Endodontic Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectfractal analysis
dc.subjectMTA plug
dc.subjectperiapical bone quality
dc.subjectregenerative endodontic treatment
dc.titleAssessment of bone quality of apical periodontitis treated with MTA plug and regenerative endodontic techniques
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar