Attitude and practice of regenerative endodontic procedures among endodontists and paediatric dentists: A multinational survey from 13 countries

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridHatipoglu, Omer/0000-0002-4628-8551
dc.authoridJaved, Muhammad Qasim/0000-0002-7586-4319
dc.authoridAl-Dhelai, Thiyezen/0000-0003-1493-9492
dc.authoridSurendar, Sugumaran/0000-0002-5338-7021
dc.authoridMartin-Biedma, Benjamin/0000-0002-4297-4220
dc.authoridTaha, Nessrin/0000-0003-3233-8850
dc.authoridMadfa, Ahmed A./0000-0001-6124-0129
dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Fatma Pertek
dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Oemer
dc.contributor.authorTaha, Nessrin
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Anna Paulina
dc.contributor.authorAldhelai, Thiyezen Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorMadfa, Ahmed A.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Haddad, Afaf
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:35:30Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:35:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Regenerative endodontics (RET) refers to biologically based procedures that aim to restore damaged tooth structures and reinstate the pulp-dentine complex to its normal physiological state.Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the attitudes and practices of endodontists and paediatric dentists regarding RET.Design: A survey was conducted among endodontists and paediatric dentists from 13 countries. A number of factors were evaluated, including frequency of RET application, followed guidelines, disinfection techniques, intracanal medication type, scaffold type, preferred coronal seal material, and follow-up period.Results: Among the 1394 respondents, 853 (61.2%) and 541 (38.8%) were endodontists and paediatric dentists, respectively. Almost half (43%) of participants have not performed RET yet. The American Association of Endodontics guideline (47.3%) was selected as the primary source for the clinical protocol. The most frequently selected irrigant solution was 1.5%-3% NaOCl at the first (26.1%) and second (13.6%) sessions. A blood clot (68.7%) and MTA (61.9%) were the most frequently selected scaffold type and coronal barrier. Most participants preferred a 6-month follow-up period.Conclusion: According to this survey, deviations exist from current RET guidelines regarding all aspects evaluated. Standardizing clinical protocols and adhering to available guidelines would help to ensure more predictable outcomes.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ipd.13101
dc.identifier.endpage534
dc.identifier.issn0960-7439
dc.identifier.issn1365-263X
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid37350350
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85165186708
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage521
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13101
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/16546
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001029857800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectdental health survey
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectpaediatric dentistry
dc.subjectregenerative endodontics
dc.titleAttitude and practice of regenerative endodontic procedures among endodontists and paediatric dentists: A multinational survey from 13 countries
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu