Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiography for detecting peri-implant alveolar bone changes using trabecular micro-structure analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOrhan, Kaan/0000-0001-6768-0176
dc.authoridMagat, Guldane/0000-0003-4418-174X
dc.contributor.authorMagat, Guldane
dc.contributor.authorOncu, Elif
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Kaan
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:34:50Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:34:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We compared changes in fractal dimension (FD) and grayscale value (GSV) of peri-implant alveolar bone on digital panoramic radiograph (DPR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) immediately after implant surgery and 12 months postoperative. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 16 patients who received posterior mandibular area dental implants with CBCT scans taken about 2 weeks after implantation and one year after implantation were analyzed. A region of interest was selected for each patient. FDs and GSVs were evaluated immediately after implant surgery and at 12-month follow-up to examine the functional loading of the implants. Results: There were no significant differences between DPR and CBCT measurements of FD values (P>0.05). No significant differences were observed between FD values and GSVs calculated after implant surgery and at the 12-month follow-up (F50.05). GSVs were not correlated with FD values (P>0.05). Conclusion: The DPR and reconstructed panoramic CBCT images exhibit similar image quality for the assessment of FD. There were no changes in FD values or GSVs of the pen-implant trabecular bone structure at the 12-month postoperative evaluation of the functional loading of the implant in comparison to values immediately after implantation. GSVs representing bone mass do not align with FD values that predict bone microstnictural parameters. Therefore, GSVs and Ws should be considered different parameters for assessing bone quality.
dc.identifier.doi10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.1.41
dc.identifier.endpage49
dc.identifier.issn2234-7550
dc.identifier.issn2234-5930
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid35221306
dc.identifier.startpage41
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.1.41
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/16195
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000766323000006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKorean Acad Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectFractals
dc.subjectBone density
dc.subjectPanoramic radiography
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomography
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.titleComparison of cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiography for detecting peri-implant alveolar bone changes using trabecular micro-structure analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu