TEFSİRDE TE’VİLİN EPİSTEMOLOJİK DAYANAKLARI: EBU’L-BEREKÂT EN-NESEFÎ ÖRNEĞİ
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2017
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Tefsirin kullandığı bilgi, çoklu mekanizmalarca denetlenip mahiyetleri, işlevleri ve hakikat değerlerine göre sınıflanmış bilgidir. Rivayet-dirayet, tefsir-te’vil, nass-içtihat/yorum, beyân-burhân veya beyân-irfân gibi nakil-akıl diyalektiğinde oluşan ayrımlar, tefsir ilminin işlediği bilginin mahiyetine, metoduna ve amacına ilişkin temel kategorilerdir. Bu kavramlar, tefsirin kullandığı bilginin ham halde bırakılmayıp haysiyet kayıtları çerçevesinde tasnif edildiğini, analitik ve sentetik işlemlere tabi tutulduğunu gösteren kavramlardır. Bu kavramların içerikleriyle birlikte bir tefsir eserinin iletmek istediği manalara ulaşmak için yazarının zihnini biçimleyen tarihi atmosferi ve yazarın bilgi ve varlık tasavvurunu da incelemek gerekmektedir. Çünkü metinler, yazarları ve ilişik oldukları tarihi ve kültürel ortamla bütünleşiktirler. Bu makale Medârik metnini anılan bağlamda dayandığı bilgi sistemleri açısından incelemektedir.
The information that commentary knowledge uses is not ordinary knowledge; but whether it is text or commentary, this information is specific information that is classified according to their nature, functions and values, with the realities inspected by multiple mechanisms. The distinctions that arise in the transmission-intellectual dialectic such as narrative-order, commentaryinterpretation, text- extraction of judgment, explanation- conclusive evidence or explanation-mysticism are the main categories of the nature and method of the information that commentary works. Moreover, these concepts are theoretical representations that show that the information they use is not left raw but is subjected to analytical and synthetic processes and scientific processes, and is not only authentic and experiential at the same time, but contemplated at the same time. For this reason, as in all historical texts, it is necessary to know the conception of knowledge and being that shapes the mind of the author along with the essence of a commentary. Because the text, the article and the attached is integrated with the historical and cultural medium. This requires the contributions of ontology, knowledge sociology and philosophy as well as biography and history.
The information that commentary knowledge uses is not ordinary knowledge; but whether it is text or commentary, this information is specific information that is classified according to their nature, functions and values, with the realities inspected by multiple mechanisms. The distinctions that arise in the transmission-intellectual dialectic such as narrative-order, commentaryinterpretation, text- extraction of judgment, explanation- conclusive evidence or explanation-mysticism are the main categories of the nature and method of the information that commentary works. Moreover, these concepts are theoretical representations that show that the information they use is not left raw but is subjected to analytical and synthetic processes and scientific processes, and is not only authentic and experiential at the same time, but contemplated at the same time. For this reason, as in all historical texts, it is necessary to know the conception of knowledge and being that shapes the mind of the author along with the essence of a commentary. Because the text, the article and the attached is integrated with the historical and cultural medium. This requires the contributions of ontology, knowledge sociology and philosophy as well as biography and history.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Din Bilimi, Beşeri Bilimler, Ortak Disiplinler, Sosyal Bilimler, Disiplinler Arası, Mantık
Kaynak
DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
20
Sayı
52
