Comparison of linear, computerized adaptive and multi stage adaptive versions of the mathematics assessment of Turkish Pupil Monitoring system

Küçük Resim Yok

Tarih

2015

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Springer New York LLC

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Özet

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of computer based linear Turkish Pupil Monitoring System (TPMS) administrations with Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) and Multi Stage Adaptive Testing (MSAT) results in mathematics assessment. On the basis of the real data obtained from TPMS, different CAT scenarios were tested in post-hoc simulations with various starting rules, termination criteria, and different control strategies of CAT using either Maximum Likelihood (ML) or Weighted Maximum Likelihood (WML) estimation procedures. Results of the CAT study indicated that WML with easy initial item difficulty, fixed test reliability termination along with item exposure and content control strategies produced defensible results. Alternatively, a multi stage scenario was designed to compare the efficiency of CAT and MSAT. Examinees were administered a fixed subtest with 15 items followed by two subtests having ten items each. Using MSAT in TPMS seemed to be producing more valid results in terms of content sampling than CAT. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.

Açıklama

Cito;CNTEST;CTB/McGraw-Hill;eMetric;Measured Progress;Stata;The College Board;The Graduate Management Admission Council;The Law School Admission Council;University of Amsterdam
78th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, 2013 -- 22 July 2013 through 26 July 2013 -- -- 111179

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ability estimation method, Computerized adaptive testing, Item exposure control and content control, Multistage adaptive testing, Pupil monitoring system

Kaynak

Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

N/A

Cilt

89

Sayı

Künye