Lübnan Anayasal Düzeninde Egemenlik Dağılımı
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2016
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Lübnan anayasal yapısı, klasik siyaset bilimi tanımlarındaki sınıflandırılmalara uymayan nevi şahsına münhasır (sui generis) bir yapıya sahiptir. Yirminci yüzyılda Lübnanlaşma (Lübnan Milliyetçiliği) ve Arap Milliyetçiliği arasındaki çatışma Lübnan siyasetinin temel zeminini teşkil etmiştir. Bu mücadele Lübnan'da klasik manada parlamenter demokrasi oluşmasının önündeki en büyük engel olmuştur. Fransız işgali döneminde Lübnan anayasası Fransa'nın ülkenin siyasi ve iktisadi denetimine tam olarak hâkim olacağı bir şekilde hazırlanmıştır. Bu çerçevede yapılan anayasa vatandaşlık hukukundan ziyade din ve mezhepler arası bir egemenlik dağılımına dayanmakta idi. Lübnan siyasi tarihinde yaşanan iç savaşlar değerlendirilirken göz önünde bulundurulması gereken temel nokta anayasal yapıda kurumsallaşan etnik ve dini yapıdır. Haklar bireysel olarak değil etnik ve dini olarak cemaatler zemininde verilmektedir. Bu durum Lübnan siyasetini doğrudan Batı ve Arap siyasetine eklemlemektedir. Aynı şekilde siyasi temsil de Lübnan siyasetinde klasik parlamenter demokrasilerde olduğu gibi seçmen sayısına göre değil etnik ve dini cemaatler arasında paylaştırılmaktadır.
Constitutional structure of Lebanon, has its own unique type that does not match with the classification of the classical political science. In the Twentieth Century, struggle between Lebanonization (Lebanese Nationalism) and Arab Nationalism was the core issue of the Lebanon politics. This struggle was the main obstacle to establish a parlamentary system in Lebanon. The Lebanese Constitution was amended which made France mandate as a supervisor of politics and economics during the France occupation period. In this context, the constitution, based on sharing the sovereignty between the religious and ethnic groups rather than constitutional rights. In the evaluation of the civil wars, have occured in the political history of Lebanon, constitutional structure which has institutionalized as an ethnic and the religious body shoud be considered as the vital point. The rights are igiven on the ethnic and religious bases rather than personal. This composition articulates the Lebanese politics in to the West and Arab politics. In the same manner political represantation in the Lebanese politics is not shared between the voters as in the clasical parlamentary regimes, shared by the ethnic and religious communities.
Constitutional structure of Lebanon, has its own unique type that does not match with the classification of the classical political science. In the Twentieth Century, struggle between Lebanonization (Lebanese Nationalism) and Arab Nationalism was the core issue of the Lebanon politics. This struggle was the main obstacle to establish a parlamentary system in Lebanon. The Lebanese Constitution was amended which made France mandate as a supervisor of politics and economics during the France occupation period. In this context, the constitution, based on sharing the sovereignty between the religious and ethnic groups rather than constitutional rights. In the evaluation of the civil wars, have occured in the political history of Lebanon, constitutional structure which has institutionalized as an ethnic and the religious body shoud be considered as the vital point. The rights are igiven on the ethnic and religious bases rather than personal. This composition articulates the Lebanese politics in to the West and Arab politics. In the same manner political represantation in the Lebanese politics is not shared between the voters as in the clasical parlamentary regimes, shared by the ethnic and religious communities.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
İktisat, İşletme
Kaynak
Sosyoekonomi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
24
Sayı
28
