Comparison of follow-up results of patients undergoing Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Herniorrhaphy or undergoing Lichtenstein Herniorrhaphy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBolat, Haci
dc.contributor.authorKocaoz, Servet
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:25:24Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:25:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study is to compare the treatment outcomes of patients that were operated for an inguinal hernia surgery with lap aro scopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair and Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy (LH). Materials and Methods: This comparative descriptive study, includes a total of 318 inguinal hernia patients treated with TEP herniorrhaphy and 159 patients treated with Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. The data of the study, Patient identification data form and Herniorrhaphy Assessment Form were used to collect data regarding the following items: postoperative complications, resting and post-exercise pain levels, length of hospital stay, time of the return to normal activity and work, recurrence rates, wound healing, the amount of scar, satisfaction with surgery and general health status. ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 6.67 +/- 2.95 and 4.23 +/- 3.06 years for TEP and LH patients, respectively Post-operative TEP patients were able to return to work sooner and postoperative scar development was less in patients with TEP. Despite having more seroma formation in the TEP group, paresthesia was less common than in the LH group. Patients in the TEP group were found to feel healthier than those in the LH group. Conclusion: Despite having more seroma and hematoma formation, TEP group had less paresthesia and permanent nerve damage outcomes compared to the LH group. TEP inguinal hernia repair recurrence rates can be close to those of the LH herniorrhaphy method if the operation is performed by a proficient surgeon.
dc.identifier.doi10.17826/cumj.662917
dc.identifier.endpage819
dc.identifier.issn2602-3032
dc.identifier.issn2602-3040
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage814
dc.identifier.trdizinid472186
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.662917
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/472186
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/14661
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000576735900006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherCukurova Univ, Fac Medicine
dc.relation.ispartofCukurova Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241106
dc.subjectInguinal hernia
dc.subjectherniorrhaphy
dc.subjectTEP
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.titleComparison of follow-up results of patients undergoing Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Herniorrhaphy or undergoing Lichtenstein Herniorrhaphy
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu