Teachers’ Opinions on Web 2.0 Tools used for Measurement and Evaluation Purposes in Distance Education
dc.contributor.author | Yenmez, Arzu Aydoğan | |
dc.contributor.author | Gökçe, Semirhan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-07T13:19:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-07T13:19:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | To limit the spread of the coronavirus, countries have favored distance education over face-to-face education. In Turkey,as well as around the world, technology has become an integral part of education. Technological tools are evolving anddeveloping on a daily basis as a result of rapid technological development. The development of Web 2.0 apps is one ofthese tools that can be considered a technological breakthrough that promotes progress by influencing teaching-learningenvironments. Teachers and students can use Web 2.0 apps to socialize along with creating, manipulating, and controllingcontent. These opportunities inspire students to contribute to the learning process and be active participants in theclassroom. An example of these technologies is the classroom response systems used for measurement and evaluation.Quizizz, Kahoot, and Socrative are examples of Web 2.0 tools that help teachers assess their students’ knowledge andskills effectively and efficiently within the context of classroom response systems. In this study, we aimed to comparethe opinions of mathematics teachers regarding the impact of Web 2.0 tools used for measurement and evaluation indistance education during the pandemic. This was a case study, which included 11 mathematics teachers. The results ofthe mathematics teachers’ opinions on the effects of Web 2.0 apps in distance education were categorized accordingto their contribution to teaching and the use of measurement tools. According to the findings, the teachers believedthat Web 2.0 apps had a positive impact on the distance education process. This study offers important applicationcomponents for future studies | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5152/hayef.2021.21008 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 178 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2602-4829 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 167 | |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 448000 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.21008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/448000 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11480/13077 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 18 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Hayef:journal of education (Online) | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_20241107 | |
dc.subject | Bilgisayar Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Yazılım Mühendisliği | |
dc.subject | Eğitim | |
dc.subject | Eğitim Araştırmaları | |
dc.title | Teachers’ Opinions on Web 2.0 Tools used for Measurement and Evaluation Purposes in Distance Education | |
dc.type | Article |