LOCKING PLATE VERSUS INTRAMEDULLARY DEVICE FIXATION FOR THE DISTAL METATARSAL CHEVRON OSTEOTOMY IN HALLUX VALGUS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSarı, Ahmet Sinan
dc.contributor.authorSevgili, Ubeydullah
dc.contributor.authorKarakuş, Özgün
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T13:16:28Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T13:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentNiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Recently, an innovative intramedullary device wasintroduced for the fixation of the capital fragment in the distalmetatarsal chevron osteotomy. The aim of the present study wasto compare the outcomes of locking plate and intramedullarydevice fixation in the distal metatarsal chevron osteotomy in thesurgical treatment of hallux valgus.Material and Methods: We reviewed 29 patients (29 feet)treated with distal metatarsal chevron osteotomies fixated bylocking plate or intramedullary device for hallux valgus.Locking plate fixation were used for 14 patients (14 feet) andintramedullary device fixation were used for 15 patients (15feet).Results: The mean follow-up period was 31 (6–56) months. Thelocking plate and intramedullary device groups did not differsignificantly with respect to age, affected side, surgical time,duration of hospital stay, follow – up period or postoperativeAmerican Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores (p>0.05).The hallux valgus angle and the intermetatarsal angle decreasedsignificantly in both the locking plate and the intramedullarydevice groups (p<0.01). Two patients (14.3%) in the lockingplate group and 5 patients (33.3%) in the intramedullary devicegroup had implant removal surgery because of implant irritationbut the difference in implant removal rates were not statisticallysignificant.Conclusion: We found both locking plate and intramedullarydevice fixation methods were effective in the fixation of distalmetatarsal chevron osteotomy for correction of moderate halluxvalgus. However, both locking plate and intramedullary devicefixation methods were associated with a relatively high implantremoval rate.
dc.identifier.doi10.24938/kutfd.573524
dc.identifier.endpage387
dc.identifier.issn2148-9645
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage377
dc.identifier.trdizinid415786
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.573524
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/415786
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11480/12355
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofKırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241107
dc.subjectOrtopedi
dc.titleLOCKING PLATE VERSUS INTRAMEDULLARY DEVICE FIXATION FOR THE DISTAL METATARSAL CHEVRON OSTEOTOMY IN HALLUX VALGUS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu