Sancaktan mukâta'aya geçiş sürecinde Harput Sancağında ehl-i örf taifesi
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2006
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Klasik dönem sancak uygulamasından mukâta’a idaresine geçiş sürecinde önce, Harput Sancağı’nın bazı gelirleri, 1642’de Diyarbekir hazinesinden ta’yin olunan maaşlarına karşılık yıllık 40.000 guruş olmak üzere Van kalesi neferâtı mevâcîbleri için ocaklık tahsîs edilmiştir. Ardından, 17. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında sancaktaki tüm mukâta’a kalemleri Harput Mukâta’ası adıyla tek bir mukâta’aya dönüştürülmüştür. İltizâm uygulamasıyla birlikte klasik dönemden farklı olarak sancağın yönetimi, mukâta’a emîni, mukâta’a zâbiti, mütesellim veya mültezim unvanlı kişilerin uhdesine geçmiştir. Klasik dönem sancakbeyinin görevleri de yine aynı kişilerce yerine getirilmeye başlanmıştır. Bu gelişmelere göre makalede sancak idaresinden mukâta’a idaresine geçiş sürecindeki askerîidarî yapı, yeni idarecilerin kimlikleri, görevleri, yerel hükümetle ilişkileri, yaptıkları zulüm ve yolsuzluklar ile ekonomik durumları ölçeğinde ele alınmaktadır.
In the Otoman classical age, before the transformaion from the subprovince to the Mukataa, it was attempted in 1642 that some revenue of the sub-province of Harput was appropriated to the soldiers in Van Casttle in return for the salaries of 40.000 Kuruş to be received from Diyarbakır budget. Later in the second half of the 17th century various mukataa revenues of the sub-province was united into one revenue and this was then called Harput mukataa. As different from the application in the classical age the administration of sub-province was taken over by the persons who were mukataa emini, mukataa zabiti, mütesellim and mültezim. The duties of governor of the sub-province in the classical age were exercised by these persons. In this paper the transformation from sub-province to mukataa the administrators of sub-province were analized by their identity, duties, their relations with the local government, their abuses and mal-administration and by their financial states.
In the Otoman classical age, before the transformaion from the subprovince to the Mukataa, it was attempted in 1642 that some revenue of the sub-province of Harput was appropriated to the soldiers in Van Casttle in return for the salaries of 40.000 Kuruş to be received from Diyarbakır budget. Later in the second half of the 17th century various mukataa revenues of the sub-province was united into one revenue and this was then called Harput mukataa. As different from the application in the classical age the administration of sub-province was taken over by the persons who were mukataa emini, mukataa zabiti, mütesellim and mültezim. The duties of governor of the sub-province in the classical age were exercised by these persons. In this paper the transformation from sub-province to mukataa the administrators of sub-province were analized by their identity, duties, their relations with the local government, their abuses and mal-administration and by their financial states.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Konu Ataması Yapılmamış
Kaynak
Osmanlı Tarihi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Dergisi OTAM
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
0
Sayı
20
